The main disadvantage of multilateral agreements is that they are complex. The details of the negotiations relate to commercial and commercial practices. This means that the public often misunderstood them. Therefore, they receive many controversies and protests. Another disadvantage is that small businesses cannot compete with huge multinationals by hurting trade barriers. They often lay off workers to reduce costs. Others relocate their companies to a participating country where wages are low. All global trade agreements are multilateral. The most successful is the General Agreement on Trade and Customs. Twenty-three countries signed the GATT in 1947, the objective of which was to reduce tariffs and other barriers to trade. It also seems likely that the US would also try to renegotiate the US-Korea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) adopted in 2012 through a similar process. In Seoul, Vice President Mike Pence told a group of economic leaders last week that the U.S.-South Korea trade relationship must change because U.S.
companies « face too many barriers to entry, which is tipping the ground against American workers, » according to the Financial Times. Within this multilateral framework, the Commission is working to improve export competition and market access, in particular for food and beverages from the EU. Currently, WTO members are engaged in a round of multilateral negotiations, known as the Doha Development Agenda. Negotiations are currently at a standstill; The four main players in the food trade (Brazil, the EU, India and the United States) have spoken but have not yet reached an agreement. But by the end of April, Trump`s opposition to multilateral trade pacts no longer seemed to imply total rejection — and destruction — of NAFTA. On the contrary, all signs point to a targeted renegotiation of the NAFTA clauses that are most troublesome for the Trump administration. According to a draft government proposal released by the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative in Congress, the U.S.
would retain some of NAFTA`s most controversial provisions, including an arbitration panel allowing investors from the three countries to bypass local courts to settle civil actions. Critics of these panels said they undermined national sovereignty. The fifth advantage applies to emerging countries. Bilateral trade agreements tend to favour the country with the best economy. This penalizes the weakest nation. But strengthening emerging economies helps the developed economy over time. The same broad scope makes them more robust than other types of trade agreements once all parties have signed them. Bilateral agreements are easier to negotiate, but these are only between two countries. From an aesthetic and structural point of view, it would be a little different. In October 2014, the United States and Brazil ended a long-standing dispute over cotton at the World Trade Organization (WTO). Brazil has terminated the case and waived its rights to take counter-measures against the United States.
. . .